CGD's Dr. David Lawrence
Lawrence, D.M. and A.G. Slater, 2007: Incorporating organic soil into a global climate model. Clim. Dyn., doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0278-1.
Figure 1.
High resolution figure
Abstract
Organic matter significantly alters a soil's thermal and hydraulic properties but is not typically included in land-surface schemes used in global climate models. This omission has consequences for ground thermal and moisture regimes, particularly in the high-latitudes where soil carbon content is generally high. Global soil carbon data is used to build a geographically distributed, profiled soil carbon density dataset for the Community Land Model (CLM). CLM parameterizations for soil thermal and hydraulic properties are modified to accommodate both mineral and organic soil matter.
Offline simulations including organic soil are characterized by cooler annual mean soil temperatures (up to ~2.5°C cooler for regions of high soil carbon content). Cooling is strong in summer due to modulation of early and mid-summer soil heat flux. Winter temperatures are slightly warmer as organic soils do not cool as efficiently during fall and winter. High porosity and hydraulic conductivity of organic soil leads to a wetter soil column but with comparatively low surface layer saturation levels and correspondingly low soil evaporation. When CLM is coupled to the Community Atmosphere Model, the reduced latent heat flux drives deeper boundary layers, associated reductions in low cloud fraction, and warmer summer air temperatures in the Arctic. Lastly, the insulative properties of organic soil reduce interannual soil temperature variability, but only marginally. This result suggests that, although the mean soil temperature cooling will delay the simulated date at which frozen soil begins to thaw under transient surface warming, organic matter may provide only weak insulation from surface warming.
Figure caption: (a) Global Soil Data Task (2000) soil carbon content regridded onto CLM 2.8° x 2.8° grid. (b) Cumulative carbon storage with depth for the two major classes of soils identified in Zinke et al. (1986) used to determine vertical soil carbon distribution in new CLM soil carbon dataset. (c) Sample soil carbon profiles for Siberian peatlands (60°-70°N, 70°-80°E), Alaska (60°-70°N, 140°-160°W), and Tropical Africa (Eq-10°N, 25°-35°E).
Lawrence, D.M., P.E. Thornton, K.W. Oleson, and G.B. Bonan, 2007: The partitioning of evapotranspiration into transpiration, soil evaporation, and canopy evaporation in a GCM: Impacts on land-atmosphere interaction.. J. Hydromet., 8, 862-880.
Figure 2.
High resolution figure
Abstract
Although the global partitioning of evapotranspiration (ET) into transpiration, soil evaporation, and canopy evaporation is not well-known, most current land-surface schemes and the few available observations indicate that transpiration is the dominant component on the global scale, followed by soil evaporation and canopy evaporation. The Community Land Model (CLM3), however, does not reflect this global view of ET partitioning with soil evaporation and canopy evaporation far outweighing transpiration. One consequence of this unrealistic ET partitioning in CLM3 is that photosynthesis, which is linked to transpiration through stomatal conductance, is significantly underestimated on a global basis. A number of modifications to CLM3 vegetation and soil hydrology parameterizations are described that improve ET partitioning and reduce an apparent dry soil bias in CLM3. The modifications reduce canopy interception and evaporation, reduce soil moisture stress on transpiration, increase transpiration through a more realistic canopy integration scheme, reduce within canopy soil evaporation, eliminate lateral drainage of soil water, increase infiltration of water into the soil, and increase the vertical redistribution of soil water. The partitioning of ET is improved, with notable increases seen in transpiration (13% to 41% of global ET) and photosynthesis (65 to 148 Pg C yr-1). Soils are wetter and exhibit a far more distinct soil moisture annual cycle and greater interseasonal soil water storage which permits plants to sustain transpiration through the dry season.
The broader influences of improved ET partitioning on land-atmosphere interaction are diverse. Stronger transpiration and reduced canopy evaporation yield an extended ET response to rain events and a shift in the precipitation distribution towards more frequent small to medium size rain events. Soil moisture memory timescales decrease particularly at deeper soil levels. Sub-surface soil moisture exerts a slightly greater influence on precipitation. These results indicate that partitioning of ET is an important task for land surface schemes, a task that will gain in relevance as GCMs evolve to incorporate ever more complex treatments of the earth's carbon and hydrologic cycles.
Figure caption: Mean annual cycle of components of the hydrologic cycle for CONTROLoff, VEGoff, and VEGHYDoff experiments. QSURF is surface runoff, QDRAIN is drainage. GPP is gross primary production.
Nicolsky D. J., V. E. Romanovsky, V. A. Alexeev, D. M. Lawrence, 2007: Improved modeling of permafrost dynamics in a GCM land-surface scheme. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08501, doi:10.1029/2007GL029525.
Abstract
Global climate models (GCM) are frequently used to understand and predict future climate change, but most GCMs do not attempt to represent permafrost dynamics and its potentially critical feedbacks on climate. In this paper, we evaluate the Community Land Model (CLM3), which is a land-surface scheme, against observations and identify potential modifications to this model that improve fidelity of permafrost and soil temperature simulations. These modifications include increasing the total soil depth by adding new layers, incorporating a surface organic layer, and modifying the numerical scheme to include unfrozen water dynamics and more realistic phase change representation.
Alexeev V. A., D. J. Nicolsky, V. E. Romanovsky, D. M. Lawrence, 2007: An evaluation of deep soil configurations in the CLM3 for improved representation of permafrost, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L09502, doi:10.1029/2007GL029536.
Abstract
A thin layer of soil used in many coupled global climate models does not resolve the heat reservoir represented by underlying ground material. Under representation of this feature leads to unrealistic simulation of temperature dynamics in the active layer and permafrost. Using the Community Land Model (CLM3) and its modifications we estimate a required thickness of soil layers to calculate temperature dynamics within certain errors. Our results show that to compute the annual cycle of temperature dynamics for cold permafrost, the soil thickness should be at least 30 meters. Decadal-to-century time scales require significantly deeper soil layers, e.g. hundreds of meters. We also tested a new geometrical configuration of the soil layer geometry which is called slab permafrost. This configuration is represented by a thick soil layer underneath the traditional resolved soil layer. The model configuration with 30 m deep resolved soil layer and a 30 to 100 m thick slab shows results that favorably compare with our benchmark model which has a fully resolved 300 m-deep soil layer.
Osborne, T.M., D.M. Lawrence, A.J. Challinor, J.M. Slingo, T.R. Wheeler, 2007: Development and assessment of a coupled crop-climate model. Glob. Change Biol., 13, 169-183.
Abstract
It is well established that crop production is inherently vulnerable to variations in the weather and climate. More recently the influence of vegetation on the state of the atmosphere has been recognized. The seasonal growth of crops can influence the atmosphere and have local impacts on the weather which in turn affects the rate of seasonal crop growth and development. Considering the coupled nature of the crop-climate system, and the fact that a significant proportion of land is devoted to the cultivation of crops, important interactions may be missed when studying crops and the climate system in isolation, particularly in the context of land use and climate change.
To represent the two-way interactions between seasonal crop growth and atmospheric variability, we integrate a crop model developed specifically to operate at large spatial scales (GLAM) into the land surface component of a global climate model (GCM; HadAM3). In the new coupled crop-climate model, the simulated environment (atmosphere and soil states) influences growth and development of the crop, while simultaneously the temporal variations in crop leaf area and height across its growing season alter the characteristics of the land surface that are important determinants of surface fluxes of heat and moisture as well as other aspects of the land-surface hydrological cycle. The coupled model realistically simulates the seasonal growth of a summer annual crop in response to the GCM's simulated weather and climate. The model also reproduces the observed relationship between seasonal rainfall and crop yield. The integration of a large-scale single crop model into a GCM, as described here, represents a first step towards the development of fully coupled crop and climate models. Future development priorities and challenges related to coupling crop and climate models are discussed.
