CGD Research Catalog
| |
 |
| |
Dr. Claudia Tebaldi |
Dr. Claudia Tebaldi
Tebaldi, C., K. Hayhoe, J.M. Arblaster and G.A. Meehl, 2006: Going to
the extremes: An intercomparison of model-simulated historical and future
changes in extreme events, Climatic Change, in press.
Projections of changes in climate extremes are critical to assessing
the potential impacts of climate change on human and natural systems.
Modeling advances now provide the opportunity of utilizing global general
circulation models (GCMs) for projections of extreme temperature and precipitation
indicators. We analyze historical and future simulations of ten such indicators
as derived from an ensemble of 9 GCMs contributing to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-AR4), under
a range of emissions scenarios. Our focus is on the consensus from the
GCM ensemble, in terms of direction and significance of the changes, at
the global average and geographical scale. The climate extremes described
by the ten indices range from heat-wave frequency to frost-day occurrence,
from dry-spell length to heavy rainfall amounts. Historical trends generally
agree with previous observational studies, providing a basic sense of
reliability for the GCM simulations. Individual model projections for
the 21st century across the three scenarios examined are in agreement
in showing greater temperature extremes consistent with a warmer climate.
For any specific temperature index, minor differences appear in the spatial
distribution of the changes across models and across scenarios, while
substantial differences appear in the relative magnitude of the trends
under different emissions rates. Depictions of a wetter world and greater
precipitation intensity emerge unequivocally in the global averages of
most of the precipitation indices. However, consensus and significance
are less strong when regional patterns are considered. This analysis provides
a first overview of projected changes in climate extremes from the IPCC-AR4
model ensemble, and has significant implications with regard to climate
projections for impact assessments.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation and the U.S.
Department of Energy.
Figure.
(High resolution
figure.) Multi-model averages of precipitation intensity (left) and
heat waves (right) indices of climate extremes. Top panels are spatial
patterns of change at the end.
|